Kenya’s school meals ambition is growing. Now we need to make local procurement work
Kenya’s school meals ambition is growing. Now we need to make local procurement work
George Kaburu &
Rikki Agudah
Latest posts


Generation Africa: The call that became a movement
October 23, 2026

Taking African food systems leadership to AFSF 2026
October 8, 2026
Share:
Kenya is entering an important moment for school meals
In September 2026, President William Ruto directed government ministries to develop the policy, financing, governance and implementation framework for a national school meals rollout beginning in the first school term of 2027, across all 47 counties.
The wider national ambition is to expand school feeding from roughly 2.6M learners to 10M by 2030. Then, in October, Kenya became the fourth co-chair of the global School Meals Coalition, joining Brazil, Finland and France.
These are significant commitments. But they also raise a practical question: As Kenya dramatically expands school meals, can we design the system so that more of the food, jobs and economic value behind those meals are rooted in local communities?
This question sits at the heart of work that APHRC, IFPRI and Wasafiri have been undertaking through the Scaling the Integration of Micro and Small Enterprises and Smallholder Farmers into School Meals Programmes in Urban Informal Settlements in Kenya initiative.
The work is testing approaches for connecting micro and small enterprises and smallholder farmers to school-meal supply chains, alongside strengthening demand for healthy and sustainable food.
The emerging experience is encouraging, but also sobering. There is demand. But demand alone does not make a market.
Across the initiative, local business associations (LBAs) are beginning to establish relationships with schools. Five preliminary supply agreements have been signed, initial deliveries have taken place, and further opportunities are being explored for 2027.
Different models are emerging too, from prepared meals to supplying food products through existing school kitchens. The work has also connected local enterprises to institutions such as MSEA and KENAFF, while the participating business associations report a membership base of 206 people, around 66% of whom are women.
These are important signals of what locally anchored school-meal supply chains could make possible. But the work has exposed an equally important lesson: school interest ≠ a signed commercial agreement ≠ a delivered order ≠ payment received.
Small suppliers can face 60–90-day buyer-credit exposure. Orders may lack validated quantities, priced schedules or approved credit. Schools themselves face affordability and procurement constraints. Local business associations vary in their ability to aggregate suppliers, manage compliance and fulfil orders reliably.
This matters enormously when we start thinking about 10M children.
National scale cannot simply mean multiplying what exists today. It means deliberately building the market infrastructure that allows school meals to become both a nutrition intervention and a dependable local economic system. So what needs to happen?
- Standardise school procurement. Schools and local suppliers need clearer arrangements covering products, quantities, quality standards, prices, payment dates and other costs.
- Finance the buying cycle. If suppliers are expected to wait 60–90 days for payment, many smaller businesses simply cannot participate. Advance payments, supply credit and receivables-backed finance are among the mechanisms worth testing.
- Build supplier-ready local business associations. Local sourcing requires more than locating farmers. Associations need reliable information about members, commodities and prices alongside the capacity to manage compliance, procurement and delivery.
- Ensure underserved and informal schools are part of the policy conversation. Evidence from APBET and other schools in informal settlements needs to inform the policy and budget case for expanding nutritious school meals, rather than allowing these schools and their communities to remain at the margins of national scale-up.
This is where Kenya’s two recent commitments matter.
A national scale-up to 10M learners creates potentially enormous and predictable demand for food. Kenya’s new leadership position in the School Meals Coalition creates a platform for the country to help shape the international conversation about how school-meal systems are financed and delivered.
The opportunity, in our view, is to connect those two ambitions.
- What if scaling school meals was not only about feeding more children, but also about building stronger local food economies around them?
- That means asking harder implementation questions now: How do we make procurement accessible to small food enterprises and farmers while maintaining food safety, quality and reliability?
- What financing arrangements protect smaller suppliers from late payments?
- What minimum capabilities should local supplier organisations demonstrate?
- And how do national and county governments, schools, financiers, farmers, SMEs and the School Meals Coalition collaborate so that successful local models can genuinely scale?
These were precisely the questions put to the Technical Advisory Group and School Meals Coalition TWG representatives during the 27 October stakeholder roundtable.
Kenya has set an ambitious destination. The next step is building the systems that can get us there.



